Statutory Forensic Analysis · Officer Liability

Understanding the SARFAESI Act: Criminal Liability of Secured Creditor (Bank)

Adv. Shakti Kumar Jain

B.Com. (Hons), CAIIB, LL.B. (Gold Medallist) · Ex-Senior Manager SBI SAMB

Originally Published January 2025 · Updated October 2026 · 8 min read

In the high-stakes realm of non-performing asset (NPA) recovery, the SARFAESI Act, 2002 stands as a potent statutory weapon for banks and financial institutions. However, the Act is an extraordinarily strict procedural law. Because it grants creditors the extraordinary power to take possession and sell mortgaged properties without obtaining a prior court decree, the judiciary insists upon flawless, scrupulous compliance with every statutory prerequisite. Any deliberate shortcut, high-handed physical seizure, or false affirmation can pierce the corporate veil, exposing both the bank and the Authorised Officer to civil tort damages and personal criminal prosecution under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) / Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

1. Strict Procedural Nature of the SARFAESI Act

The Supreme Court in landmark judgments—from Mardia Chemicals to Mathew K. Cherian—has repeatedly affirmed that the draconian powers conferred under Section 13 are balanced by statutory safeguards designed to protect constitutional property rights under Article 300A. A secured creditor cannot take the law into its own hands. If an Authorised Officer deploys recovery agents or private bouncers to forcibly evict occupants without a judicial order from the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) or District Magistrate (DM) under Section 14, such action is void of statutory sanction and constitutes an act of lawlessness.

2. Criminal Offenses for Forcible Possession without Due Process

Section 32 of the SARFAESI Act provides statutory immunity to bank officials only for actions taken "in good faith" in pursuance of the Act or rules. Where the bank acts with mala fides, or takes possession of properties that were never legally mortgaged, Section 32 immunity completely evaporates:

Criminal Trespass (IPC Section 441 / 447; BNS Section 329): Entering into or upon property without lawful authority, or unlawfully remaining there with intent to intimidate, insult, or annoy the occupant.
Wrongful Restraint & Confinement (IPC Section 339 / 341; BNS Section 126): Obstructing any person from proceeding in any direction in which that person has a legal right to proceed (e.g., locking out legitimate occupants or locking tenants inside premises).
Theft & Criminal Misappropriation (IPC Section 378 / 403; BNS Section 303): Taking movable assets, machinery, or stock belonging to the borrower or third parties without preparing a formal, contemporaneous inventory and Panchnama signed by independent witnesses under Rule 8(2) of the Security Interest Rules.

3. Misrepresentation to the Magistrate: Section 14 Affidavit Perjury

Following the statutory amendment introducing Section 14(1-A), every application filed by a secured creditor before the District Magistrate (DM) or CMM must be accompanied by an affidavit affirmed by the Authorised Officer declaring a mandatory 9-point factual matrix:

That the aggregate debt was lawfully disbursed and remains unpaid.
That the security interest was legally created and registered with CERSAI.
That the borrower committed default and the account was lawfully classified NPA under RBI guidelines.
That a Section 13(2) notice was served in accordance with the law.
That any Section 13(3A) objections were considered and disposed of by a reasoned communication within 15 days.
That the borrower failed to discharge the debt within the 60-day notice period.
That the provisions of the SARFAESI Act and rules have been meticulously complied with.

If an Authorised Officer affirms this affidavit falsely—such as falsely claiming that 13(3A) objections were answered when they were ignored, or concealing that the borrower had paid substantial amounts, or misrepresenting the boundary description of the asset—the officer is liable for prosecution for Perjury and Fabricating False Evidence (IPC Sections 191, 192, 193; BNS Section 227). The Magistrate or High Court can direct the registration of a criminal complaint under Section 340 read with Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) / Section 379 BNSS.

4. Civil Tort & Section 19 Statutory Liability for Damages

Under Section 19 of the SARFAESI Act, if the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) or Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) determines on an application under Section 17 that the possession of the secured asset by the secured creditor was wrongful, the Tribunal has express statutory jurisdiction to:

Direct the secured creditor to restore possession of the asset to the borrower or person entitled.
Award substantial compensation and legal costs against the bank for mental agony, loss of business revenue, and damages caused to the property.

5. Abuse of Power & Offenses by Public Servants

Officers of Public Sector Banks (PSBs) are deemed "public servants" under Section 2(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 21 of the IPC. When PSB officials act corruptly, collude with unscrupulous auction syndicates to undervalue distressed properties, or deliberately flout statutory directives to benefit rival commercial entities, they attract criminal prosecution under:

IPC Section 166: Public servant disobeying direction under the law with intent to cause injury to any person.
IPC Section 167: Public servant framing an incorrect document with intent to cause injury.
IPC Section 218: Public servant framing incorrect record to save person from punishment or property from forfeiture.
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Section 13(1)(d)): Criminal misconduct and obtaining valuable advantage by corrupt or illegal means.

6. How Secured Creditors Must Protect Themselves

To insulate the financial institution and its Authorised Officers from severe personal and institutional liabilities, lenders must adhere to a rigorous operational protocol:

Title Forensic Audit: Conduct a comprehensive 30-year title search to confirm the legal validity and unencumbered status of the mortgage before issuing demand notices.
Reasoned Orders: Ensure that every representation or objection filed by a borrower under Section 13(3A) receives a customized, speaking reply within 15 days, drafted in consultation with experienced legal counsel.
Scrupulous Panchnama: Execute physical possession strictly under Section 14 with Magistrate-appointed Court Commissioners, drawing an exhaustive Panchnama and videographing all movable assets in the presence of two independent local witnesses.

Statutory Notice: This article is authored strictly for academic and educational guidance under Bar Council of India Rule 36. It does not constitute legal advice or formal representation. Legal remedies against unlawful bank actions require precise factual scrutiny before the competent Debt Recovery Tribunal or High Court.

Adv. Shakti Kumar Jain

B.Com. (Hons), CAIIB, LL.B. (Gold Medallist). Former Senior Manager, State Bank of India Stressed Assets Management Branch (SAMB) with 35+ years of core institutional banking experience. Now practicing Advocate specializing in SARFAESI Act, DRT litigation, and NPA resolution before the Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh.

View Complete Advocate Profile →